ban chatgpt
Waiting, Banning, and Embracing: An Empirical Analysis of Adapting Policies for Generative AI in Higher Education
Xiao, Ping, Chen, Yuanyuan, Bao, Weining
Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT have recently gained significant attention in higher education. This study aims to understand how universities establish policies regarding the use of AI tools and explore the factors that influence their decisions. Our study examines ChatGPT policies implemented at universities around the world, including their existence, content, and issuance dates. Specifically, we analyzed the top 500 universities according to the 2022 QS World University Rankings. Our findings indicate that there is significant variation in university policies. Less than one-third of the universities included in the study had implemented ChatGPT policies. Of the universities with ChatGPT policies, approximately 67 percent embraced ChatGPT in teaching and learning, more than twice the number of universities that banned it. The majority of the universities that ban the use of ChatGPT in assessments allow individual instructors to deviate from this restrictive policy. Our empirical analysis identifies several factors that are significantly and positively correlated with a university's likelihood of having a ChatGPT policy, including the university's academic reputation score, being in an English-speaking country, and the general public attitudes toward ChatGPT. In addition, we found that a university's likelihood of having a ban policy is positively associated with faculty student ratio, citations, and the English-speaking country dummy, while negatively associated with the number of peer universities within the same country that have banned ChatGPT. We discuss the challenges faced by universities based our empirical findings.
Virginia Gov. Youngkin says more schools should ban ChatGPT
New York attorney and writer Alexander Zubatov weighs in on how A.I. is rapidly changing society and says he's concerned about A.I. being used as a weapon against descent on'The Ingraham Angle.' Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin said Thursday that more school districts should ban the ChatGPT artificial intelligence tool. The Republican said during a CNN evening town hall that the U.S. should be clear about its goal as a nation "which is to make sure that our kids can think and, therefore, if a machine is thinking for them, then we're not accomplishing our goal." "I do think that it's something to be very careful of, and I do think more districts, more school districts should ban it," the governor said. Earlier in the year, public schools in northern Virginia blocked the chatbot from county-issued devices. ARE YOU READY FOR AI VOICE CLONING ON YOUR PHONE?
Don't Ban ChatGPT in Schools. Teach With It. - The New York Times
Recently, I gave a talk to a group of K-12 teachers and public school administrators in New York. The topic was artificial intelligence, and how schools would need to adapt to prepare students for a future filled with all kinds of capable A.I. tools. But it turned out that my audience cared about only one A.I. tool: ChatGPT, the buzzy chat bot developed by OpenAI that is capable of writing cogent essays, solving science and math problems and producing working computer code. ChatGPT is new -- it was released in late November -- but it has already sent many educators into a panic. Students are using it to write their assignments, passing off A.I.-generated essays and problem sets as their own.